Dave Pear's Blog

We’re sorry but we just couldn’t help it. Comparing recent news involving two big-name coaches like John Madden and Joe Paterno Last week, John Madden came forward like the great leader he is and declared that they would now be taking players out of the game when they get concussed. In the Electronic Arts video game that bears his name. Nice. Is that much different than the Wall of Silence that we’ve seen from coach Joe Paterno surrounding the juggernaut of charges still mounting against his BFF Jerry Sandusky that include child sex abuse and rape? Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, both of them continue to believe in the sanctity of football to protect those at the top from any accountability. It’s this arrogant air that finds the rest of us scratching our heads wondering what planet these people are living on.
. continue reading »

Posted with the express consent of Matt Chaney:

Critics, Evidence Debunk ‘Concussion Testing’ in Football

By Matt Chaney
.
April 25, 2011
.


.
This post is an excerpt preview for a pending analysis on Chaney’s Blog, ‘Brain Trauma Stalks Football Players, Dictates Impact Game Reform,’ which will include independent experts’ recommendations for constructive steps imperative to the sport’s survival at public schools and colleges.
.
Today’s official effort against gridiron brain trauma recycles the old “safer football” concept.
.
In the NFL and trickling down to colleges, schools and youth leagues, “behavior modification” of players involves teaching “proper contact,” or “form tackling” as known in 1976. Coaches tell football players to hit without using heads, as if hogs might be taught to fly.
.
Current purveyors of the theory, led by Chris Nowinski and Dr. Robert Cantu of the Sports Legacy Institute, and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell—who funds the Nowinski nonprofit with $1 million—propose action reminiscent of the plug-in electric football game, with plastic players bumping across the vibrating surface, hooking at shoulders in ring dances.
.
And that’s only the beginning of hocus-pocus remedy for rampant head injury in American football.
.
While mysteries are daunting for the problem, like positive diagnosis of concussion, mere clinical intuition guides the varied protocols of diagnosis and judgment for when players are fit to compete again. No random clinical trial of legitimacy has been attempted.
.
The growing national setup worries Dr. Lester Mayers, concussion researcher of Pace University athletics, who joins experts like Dr. Bennet Omalu in sounding alarm over football’s touting concussion testing as valid, which is parroted by most media..
These critics warn football conducts potentially dangerous “concussion management” based on incomplete research for assessing symptoms, and many brain-injured players are prematurely returning to contact, all ages, typically within days.
.
Indeed, radiology techniques are demonstrating holes in concussion testing, notably of studies at Purdue University, where functional MRI reveals that sub-concussive brain injury in prep players is missed by standard external assessments through computer.
.
At Purdue, teen football athletes displaying brain injury through diffusion tensor imaging, an fMRI technique, are registering normal state in intuitive-grounded baseline tests and monitoring systems of neuropsychology.
.
Last month in Washington, lawmakers heard a military concussion test fails badly, the Website www.nextgov.com reported. The test, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, “is insensitive and nonspecific,” said Lt. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, surgeon general of the U.S. Army. “It misses about a quarter to a third of (soldiers) who are concussed and includes about 50 percent of (those) not concussed.”
.
Insurance companies inform military officials that the assessments lack scientific vetting for validity and reliability, and carriers have alerted schools in Washington state that concussion testing could raise liability stakes for personnel who administer the tests in error, The New York Times reported.
.
Meanwhile, concussion testing takes a thrashing in independent peer review.
.
Current Sports Medicine Reports recently published another scathing analysis by Christopher Randolph in Chicago, professor of neurology at Loyola University, who details glaring faults in “baseline” testing of hot-selling ImPACT software employed by youth leagues, schools, colleges and pro sports. “The use of baseline neuropsychological testing in the management of sport-related concussion has gained widespread acceptance, largely in the absence of any evidence suggesting that it modifies risk for athletes,” Randolph observes.
.
Since 2005, Randolph is among reviewers for several journals who find unacceptable rates of false-positive and false-negative results for ImPACT, among popular brain assessments developed and marketed by academics and doctors associated with the NFL and benefiting from the league’s pervasive publicity machine.
.
“It is a major conflict of interest, scientifically irresponsible,” Randolph told ESPN The Magazine in 2007. “We are trying to get to what the real risks are of sports-related concussion, and you have to wonder why they (NFL experts) are promoting testing. Do they have an agenda to sell more ImPACTS?”
.
The marketing succeeds, with sales to a thousand schools and hundreds of colleges thus far, and media only increase exposure of ImPACT in the furor over concussions, especially in football.
.
An overwhelming majority of journalists, politicians, educators and football experts ignore the accumulating evidence rebuking concussion testing as invalid and unreliable, choosing instead to endorse the quick-fix notion and push it for mandate by law.
.
“With the tools to properly manage concussions and implement safety precautions, parents, coaches and students can change the culture of school sports for the better and keep our students safe on the field and thriving in the classroom,” declared U.S. Rep. George Miller, of California.
.
Such rhetoric confounds Mayers. “The response is infantile,” he said. “The ImPACT people have taken over the idea that somehow they can tell you when it’s OK that the athlete goes back.”
.
The engineers and marketers of ImPACT, neuropsychologists Mark R. Lovell and Michael W. Collins in Pittsburgh, did not respond to questions about their product recently forwarded them. Lovell is the former NFL director of NP testing, and his consulting for the Steelers franchise spurred development of ImPACT software. Collins is on the Steelers medical staff and consults for other teams. A third partner in the product is Dr. Joseph Maroon, Steelers neurosurgeon who serves on the NFL committee overseeing concussion management.
.
“The topic of sport-related concussion has been highly visible in the media over the last few years… and the issue of concussion management in the NFL even has reached the point of Congressional hearings,” Randolph wrote in the January-February edition of Reports. “What consistently is missing from these debates, however, is a rational, empirically-based discussion of the true risks associated with sport-related concussion, the potential for any given management strategy to modify these risks, and the actual evidence that such risk modification can be achieved. In addition, there has been little attention paid to the clinical validity or psychometric characteristics of (computer) baseline tests, despite widespread use of these measures.”
.
Randolph, characterizing utility of the tool as “clinical guesswork in most cases,” concluded: “It is clear that, to date, the baseline tests used in sport-related concussion management programs lack sufficient clinical validity and reliability for their intended purpose.”
.
Mayers cites lack of specificity and sensitivity for NP tests on the market. “Basically, they’re all unsuitable for clinical work with concussions,” said Mayers, director of sports medicine for Pace University in New York. “They don’t have the reliability, the accuracy or the validity, the three technical terms for the use of neuro-psych work. They’ll miss 20 to 25 percent of athletes who have concussions, and this has been used by the NFL and the National Hockey League, and the NCAA is considering mandating this.”
.
Word is that the NCAA will soon require concussion testing of all member schools, with NFL officials and experts behind the push, and Mayers says these factors helped his department adopt computer assessment, posing a dilemma for him.
.
Mayers authored a 2008 review published by Archives of Neurology, concluding a concussed athlete should be sidelined at least four to six weeks, but he notes football’s current “standard of practice” for brain trauma includes NP testing and fast return to play, so he conformed at Pace. “I really believe four to six weeks (recovery time) is appropriate, but it’s not the standard of community,” he said. “So I could be sued by an athlete I held out for four weeks, if he chose to do so.”
.
A neurology journal has approved publication of a new Mayers review, which denounces computerized concussion assessment, he said.
.
More medical voices doubt concussion testing. Dr. Randall Benson, imaging expert and neurologist at Wayne State University, warned Congress last year “that neuropsychology is not an exact science,” a fact echoed by Dr. Jeffrey Kutcher, of Michigan Neurosport, testifying for the same committee. “Relying on protocols is, in my opinion, potentially dangerous, clinical protocols, as they assume that concussions are similar enough to each other to fit a predetermined paradigm,” said Kutcher, who serves on committees for the NFL and American Academy of Neurology.
.
Dr. Omalu, practitioner of science and law, says concussion testing amounts to “fraud” in the context of accurate, reliable diagnosis, and it can be harmful during initial days following trauma—when most injured athletes, suffering chemical disruption of brain cells, are subjected to mental strain of the programs. The online ImPACT test lasts 20 to 30 minutes and presents memory challenges involving colors, texts and forms.
.
“ImPACT testing is not a diagnosis tool,” said Omalu, chief medical examiner for San Joaquin County, California, and director of autopsy for the independent Brain Injury Research Institute. “It is a forensic follow-up to monitoring a patient, to evaluate the amount of damage. Using (computerized) testing in the acute phase of injury can actually make the symptoms worse.”
.
Doctors outside sports medicine would agree, Omalu added, and apparently many who work in athletics, given media reports of concussed youths prescribed isolation with total layoffs ranging from a month to two years.
.
Dustin Fink, a certified athletic trainer in Illinois, seconds Omalu. Fink discourages computerized testing until a concussed athlete is free of symptoms such as headaches, memory loss and unsteadiness. “I use the NP tests as a baseline to educate the athlete about what some signs and symptoms could become present and as a true baseline when they think that are ready to return,” said Fink, an injury authority whose popular Website, theconcussionblog.com, serves as information clearinghouse.
.
Fink believes “money grab” drives overuse of concussion testing, and he generally supports Omalu’s publicized stance that longer rest is needed for concussed athletes. At Shelbyville High School, where Fink works, “we are seeing recovery times on the average of 24 days,” he said. “More and more evidence suggests that a 28 to 42-day (layoff) period may be necessary.”
.
In previous reports on Chaney’s Blog, Omalu has proposed concussed juvenile football players be sidelined at least three months. Omalu says NFL players should rest one to three months with diagnosed concussion, depending on severity and technology for treatment, which he advocates to be functional MRI that isn’t approved by the league.
.
Only sports in civilian life will quickly return the brain-injured to activity, and a practice of general medicine calls for strict isolation lasting days and longer, involving no stress mentally and physically.
.
In the military, researcher Craig Bryan, a psychologist and professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, recently concluded that three days of isolation, removed from sunlight, was optimum for beginning treatment of concussed soldiers.
.
A neural consultant for the New York Jets once discouraged use of NP testing on a football player until symptoms abated, based on a large NCAA study he’d co-authored, and quickly found himself out of the league.
.
During a 2004 conference in New York, neuropsychologist Bill Barr remarked that “the research indicated that the best time to do neuropsychological tests on players with concussions was after their symptoms had completely cleared, usually five to 10 days after the trauma,” Peter Keating reported for ESPN in 2006.
.
Jets physician Dr. Elliot Pellman confronted Barr after the conference, and the neuropsychologist ended up losing both his job with the team and his place in league research. “NFL teams, Barr understood, preferred testing players just one to two days after a concussion, allowing for quicker diagnoses and returns to play,” Keating reported.
.
Barr, of the Comprehensive Epilepsy Center at NYU, did not respond to a recent interview request.
.

continue reading »

We’re continuing to see more mainstream media stories on the life of retired football players with an emphasis on the long-term damages of untreated concussions and career injuries. It seems the LA Times has been all over many of the issues that directly affect the retired players. We’ll start off a piece from Bill Dwyre on 49ers Hall-of-Famer Ronnie Lott.
.

.

Ronnie Lott knows his days of misery are coming

continue reading »

Posted with the express consent of Evan Weiner:

THE BUSINESS AND POLITICS OF SPORTS

By Evan Weiner

March 7, 2011

.

As the representatives from the National Football League ownership group and the National Football League Players Association continue to try and bridge their differences and sign a new collective bargaining agreement (and yes Green Bay Packers players have collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin despite the best efforts of the state’s governor to bust public employee unions as Governor Scott Walker told the fake David Koch), it might be useful to review 60 years of television money and players association activity and how closely linked television and the players really are.

.

NFL owners were planning to use some $4 billion in 2011 television rights fees to underwrite a lockout. Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. (FOX), General Electric (now Comcast)’s NBC, Sumner Redstone’s CBS, the Walt Disney Company’s ESPN and DirecTV cozied up to the NFL owners because the owners’ product is still a consistently watched fare in an increasingly fragmented audience industry: TV.

. continue reading »

A couple of recent articles caught our attention today, one of them discussing the Madden Curse – what happens when you find yourself featured on the cover of the latest edition of Electronic Arts Madden Football:

.

continue reading »

Would you trust your brain or your money with this man?

We have no idea how anyone missed this little tidbit from the Congressional hearings on brain concussions in the NFL. The media rightfully focused on stirring comments made by former Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ owner Gay Culverhouse regarding the complete lack of advocacy for the players when it comes to brain injuries: The team doctors are hired by the owners and are employed to protect their investment; many of the coaches and owners often play golf with the team doctors in their free time. Tampa Bay Online covered Ms. Culverhouse’s testimony closely and the last paragraph in their story says a lot about just how seriously Roger Goodell plans on looking into brain concussions.

continue reading »

4/17/2009
Subject: Madden not paying retired players while collecting over $100 million in royalties off the retired players’ backs – Did Madden scramble your identity to keep from paying you?

The retired NFL players who were used in Madden EA video games will be suing Madden and EA for using us in those games without compensating us. Madden’s agent Sandy Montag boasts he and Madden collected over $100,000,000 in royalties while paying the retired NFL players used in those games absolutely nothing. Madden knows that the ugly truthful litigation is coming and is probably factoring that into his retirement. I doubt he wants to answer all those fans who will be asking, “Why, John Madden? Why did you screw all those retired players over, you seemed like such a friendly, good-natured buffoon?”

continue reading »

The Congressional Confirmation Hearings for Eric Holder as Attorney General are going on right now. Most of the retired players have expressed their negative views about this mouthpiece and lobbyist for the NFL. Their fears of Holder running interference with ongoing Congressional investigations into the NFL’s mistreatment of its retired players need to be brought to the forefront to ensure that Holder will be forced to recuse himself from anything to do with the NFL. Better yet – after looking at some of the press coverage on the things he’s been involved with over the years, perhaps he shouldn’t be confirmed.

No doubt, Holder is one of the best lawyers money can buy… But surely there are better, more ethical attorneys (is that an oxymoron?) for the job?

continue reading »

Where's John Madden?

We don’t know how many of you remember the kids’ series of books, “Where’s Waldo?“. But we’re sure it’s Where’s John Madden? time now. (We had a clip on the blog just before the trial started. Click HERE to read it.)

continue reading »

Dave was actually watching a bit of football on Sunday afternoon when he heard Al Michaels mention that his co-anchor, John Madden, was off on a two-week “vacation.” Coincidentally, the NFLPA/Players Inc. trial happens to be starting on Monday, October 20th. Even though he’s apparently not subpoenaed to testify, it’s rather mysterious that he’d take a couple of weeks off while the trial is running. Perhaps he just want to dodge some interesting questions.

So Sports Illustrated decided to have a little fun this morning on their SI.com website, comparing John Madden to legendary high-school slacker Ferris Bueller (played by Matthew Broderick in the movie Ferris Bueller’s Day Off – click HERE to read about the movie). And just click on the picture below to go to Sports Illustrated’s story.

continue reading »

Like many of us, Jeff Nixon’s been following the class action lawsuit between players (mostly retired) against the NFLPA an its, subsidiary, Players, Inc. The trial starts October 20th in San Francisco.

continue reading »