Dave Pear's Blog

EDITOR’S NOTE: Several weeks back, the NFLPA put out a request to local chapters for three questions to send along to their big meeting in Washington DC. Disability Attorney John Hogan actually had a few questions to point out in the new CBA. John also has some observations from a recent case that was “approved” by the Disability Board:
.
1. The CBA contains some significant changes in disability – specifically, there will no longer be a requirement to show that your disability is ALL football-related. Why weren’t these changes made retroactive so that guys who are disabled but denied football degenerative might be able to get a better deal?
. continue reading »

Over the past couple of weeks, absolutely nothing of any serious significance or substance out of the NFLPA regarding retired players pensions especially that new Legacy Fund, other than a lot of the same chest-thumping and empty rhetoric that everyone has been hearing since the lockout ended late this summer. It would certainly seem like the lawyers have taken over once again and put out that Say Nothing Memo.
.
There was a meeting of the Seattle Chapter (probably much like other chapter meetings across the country) where the usual 8 members – out of approximately 48 NFLPA members listed in the Seattle area – showed up and voted on a few things that we’re sure will make a huge difference to all retirees: The meeting introduced some Business Opportunities (Hair Products!), the Touchdowns for Homes Programs, as well as some discussion on the School of Legends program. We also finally have some backhanded acknowledgment from the NFLPA HQ about loss of hearing from football (a shiny new discount hearing aid program!).
. continue reading »

Both the NFLPA and George Martin’s NFL Alumni have been trying to take credit for everything being offered to retired players from the new CBA. In the meanwhile, they’ve also done their best to ignore what retired players have actually been demanding long before this current CBA while never really putting their cards on the table about what it is that they’ve actually decided for retirees – without their direct input. The Union simply refused to be in the same room while discussions were being held directly with Commissioner Goodell and now they continue to play a let’s-wait-and-see attitude by blaming the League for holding up the final agreement. And they continue to take credit for the wonderful things they’ve done for retirees all while they weren’t a Union (during de-certification!).
.
Meanwhile, back at the Alumni ranch, George Martin’s $250,000+ annual salary and bonuses are apparently not enough so he also had to do some endorsement work. George has been driving around in a brand-new $65,000+ Cadillac Platinum Edition Escalade ESV for the last week or so since the Alumni Golf Tournament tweeting all about his praises for his loaner wheels much to the delight of Government Motors. (Read the official NFL Alumni Press Release by clicking HERE.) FOX Sports’ Alex Marvez had a few more words to say about that ride:
. continue reading »

First the serious stuff: One more helmet concussion lawsuit filed in California by Hausfeld LLP and Pearson Simon Warshaw & Penny LLP, on behalf of Cedrick Hardman and Tommy Mason against the NFL, Riddell and Easton-Bell. The two Exhibits include proposals for medical monitoring and benefits after a career in football.
.

.
And we’re not letting the NFLPA off the hook today either: Here’s another good reason for retired players to manage and administer their own benefits: Be sure to read about the Gene Upshaw NFL Player Health Reimburse lobby at the end of this post! Oh well – Another day, another $100,000!
. continue reading »

.
In our last post - click HERE if you’d like to read it again – we posted an exchange of e-mails from Bob Kuechenberg with questions on the current CBA, the Legacy Fund and benefits in general for retired players (particularly the pre-93ers). For weeks, those within the NFLPA have been stonewalling retirees with vague answers as well as pointing the finger at others to lay blame for lack of any clarity on what and how retired players will be receiving “new” benefits. One thing the PA has shown consistency with has always been, “We know what’s best for retired players and you’ll get what’s left AFTER we’ve already carved up the pie for the active players. And by the way – no one can talk about this stuff at local chapter meetings because it’s too negative and divisive!”
.
What’s worse: The NFLPA was invited to the table for a real opportunity to sit down with the Commissioner and representatives of the retired players in September because “they were being sued by the retired players” so they couldn’t show up. Never mind that Nolan Harrison III and Jim McFarland were invited – AND attended – the first meeting and subsequent conference calls with the largest unified collective of retired players representatives to have ever assembled for one goal: To take charge of their own pension and disability benefits. And never mind that the non-Union (decertified) individuals and the League were also subsequently sued by retired players at that time. (EDITOR’S NOTE: To Jim McFarland’s credit, he’s been the only man on the inside who’s been speaking up on the real issues relevant to retired players but of course, no one seems to be listening to him and he has absolutely NO vote.)
. continue reading »

EDITOR’S NOTE: Another exchange that Bob Kuechenberg recently had with your NFLPA representatives who are still asking what’s important to retired players. (?!!) The only three things that matter to retired football players have always been – and will always continue to be – real access to THEIR EARNED:
.
• Disability Benefits
• Pension Benefits
• Medical after football
.
Some of you may also recall several chapter presidents resigned in recent years in protest after being told what they could and could not talk about at chapter meetings
. continue reading »

It seems that the PA is still managing to put out as much as they can without saying anything while still blaming everyone else for holding the process up. Oh wait – they’re in Washington DC! That’s what EVERYONE does up there! We forgot!
.
So over the past week, we’ve received a few more ‘communiques’ from our local NFLPA chapter via Sam McCullum and it always seems that the guy in the room with no vote or real voice on any matters has the clearest take on everything. Jim McFarland – retired players’ representative – has provided some of the clearest analysis on what’s proposed in the final CBA for the Legacy Fund and how it will affect pre-93 players. Here are the e-mails and comments starting with the latest first. We also included a copy of that meeting proposal document referenced in the most recent e-mail and have loaded it up to Scribd for easier reading and printing.
.
One more thing: And the NFLPA and Sam McCullum says none of you should be reading any of the blogs to get your information. Of course, they didn’t attend what may have been one of the most important meetings of the year regarding retirees because they didn’t want to hear what everyone else wanted them to hear so they can’t tell you about it. (?!!)
. continue reading »

EDITOR’S NOTE: We just received an update from disability attorney John Hogan on another of his recent disability applications on behalf of another retired football player. He also included a copy of the Disability Board’s short 3-page boilerplate ruling.
.

Attached is a recent decision I received from the Bell/Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan’s Disability Initial Claims Committee (DICC) finding that a former player was entitled to Inactive Benefits. (It was filed prior to Sept. 1st, so the new CBA rules do not apply and we are seeking Football Degenerative benefits.) continue reading »

.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This first e-mail was just added on Saturday afternoon:
. continue reading »

Some reading material for your weekend. We have a recent newsletter from Hausfeld LLP and Zelle Hofmann that provides an update on much of what’s been happening with the retired players’ lawsuit as well as recent information and links of interest to football players and fans alike regarding concussions. They also provide some straight-forward analysis of the new CBA and how it will affect retirees’ benefits that you probably won’t be hearing from the NFLPA any time soon.
.
And Sports Life Magazine’s Rick Kelsheimer spoke with us last month about Dave’s long battle with the NFL and the NFLPA and was gracious enough to provide us with an advance copy of his story that will appear in the October 2011 edition.
.
We uploaded full copies of the newsletter and the Sports Life article to Scribd for easy viewing and to make it downloadable for printing. You can also click the Enlarge icon in the center of the menu at the bottom of the viewing screen to go Full Screen for easier reading (just hit the ESC key to close): continue reading »

.

.
Over the past four and a half decades I have witnessed many, many, many, many acts of injustice, chicanery and dishonesty. Some of these acts occurred on the fields and arenas in sport (as a player, teammate and coach), some in the halls of justice, some in the media and press and others in the avenues of everyday life. But never in all my years of experience and knowledge as an athlete, coach, prosecutor, judge, attorney, teacher, professor, journalist, author and rights advocate, have I ever witnessed such open acts of deliberate manipulations of the truth, excessive greed, conscious indifference, breach of trust, conflicts of interest and cowardice as I have in observing the conduct of Gene Upshaw and DeMaurice Smith and their cronies.
.
Mr. Smith’s conduct - which we will call at this time, “legal crimes” – are of a great intensity. That is because he appears to have consciously misrepresented his intentions and the facts to the public, the press and the media and deliberately pulled on the heart strings of those Pre-1993 retired NFL players by promising effort and commitment at a level he never intended to perform.
.
Certainly the results of the 2011 version of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, as it pertains to the Pre-1993 retired NFL players, was not within light years of the satisfactory conclusion DeMaurice Smith led the retirees, press, media and public to believe. In fact, it was a smoke screen of a disingenuous effort to placate society and discard the heroes of the game like an old shoe who no longer had a sole/soul to stand on. Since that dismal day, very few press or media or others have sought to inquire with any in-depth scrutiny, the true determination of the so-called efforts that DeMaurice Smith made for Pre-1993 retired NFL players (while allegedly negotiating for benefits on their behalf). Some reporters, oblivious to the reality of the true finding, actually praised the pathetic result.
.
Without a doubt, Gene Upshaw was a disgrace as an advocate for pre-1993 retired NFL players. Anyone with half a brain and a conscience knows that. It is an inescapable truth. Jimmy Hoffa could have taken lessons from Upshaw (and his advisors) on how to legally divert millions of dollars into their own greedy hands to the detriment of those who put him in the trusted position as Executive Director. If you will recall, Dick Berthelsen (former interim Executive Director NFLPA and NFLPA General Counsel) said that “whatever Gene is getting paid, it’s not enough.” How much did you get paid to say that, Dick? Remember – at his death, Upshaw left his heirs an estate filled with millions of dollars in real property, luxury cars, extremely valuable personal property and, to our knowledge (at this time), legally diverted funds (from the union marketing company and the NFLPA) easily exceeding $15 million in deferred compensation (according to Washington Post reporter, Tom Jackman, the closer calculation is approximately $19.7 million!). Apparently, the person who was sitting as the Acting Executive Director at that time was… you guessed it: the infamous Dick Berthelsen.
.
Although at this juncture, we could assume DeMaurice Smith has yet to legally divert the enormous wealth Upshaw accumulated so slickly, his conduct is – in the full scope of the events at hand – even more despicable and deplorable than Upshaw. However, let’s not forget: DeMaurice Smith has already made millions since starting his position as Executive Director of the NFLPA. Upshaw, despite his many times in promising to help them, made it clear to the pre-1993 retired players who he really worked for and who had the power to fire him (and it wasn’t retired players.). Many retired players believed that Gene Upshaw was an arrogant and untrustworthy individual. Why then is DeMaurice Smith’s conduct even more despicable and more deplorable than Upshaw (however, others may still say that is a debatable question)?
.
Here’s why: DeMaurice Smith is a former United States Attorney.
.
However, in a broader reality, DeMaurice Smith portrayed himself as much more than just an attorney. DeMaurice Smith emphasized that he was a former Assistant United States Attorney having served under the present Attorney General of the United States. Therefore, it can be assumed, Smith became the Executive Director due to his employment under Attorney General Holder and the sense of integrity and expected “shroud of trust” that position exudes.
.
Therefore, let us unequivocally state, as it pertains to pre-1993 retired NFL players, DeMaurice Smith took the position as the Executive Director of the NFLPA under a cloak of hope and trust which we believe he has openly and secretively betrayed.
.
That “shroud of trust” has been torn!
.
There is nothing more despicable and deplorable than to betray a trust to those individuals whom you, Mr. Smith, are alleging you were empowered to protect. That betrayal becomes metastasized when it is inflicted upon many who are old and virtually defenseless. Do you get that, Mr. Smith?
.
DeMaurice Smith’s alleged attempts at negotiating benefits on the behalf of pre-1993 retired NFL Players was more than a sad joke. It appears to have been a calculated deception to avoid turmoil during a time when an appearance of a unified front was a vital element of a plan to achieve the goals he was truly seeking. It appears that Smith’s agenda was to resolve the major issues regarding the active NFL players while simultaneously using the pre-1993 retired players’ concerns of inadequate pensions, inadequate health insurance and virtually unachievable disability benefits as sacrificial bargaining chips. America – in the legal profession, that is a crystal clear example of having the appearance of a conflict of interest. Ask Mr. Smith.
.
If DeMaurice Smith had done as he preached – “ONE TEAM” – then all that has happened since he took office would be diametrically different. Presumably, Berthelsen would have been fired the first day Smith took office. Tom Condon’s (Upshaw’s attorney/agent) influence on all matters relating to the marketing company and the union would have been terminated. Furthermore, a new Disability Board would be established (minus the trained seals appointed by the union leadership) with qualified members (that had no ties to the members, their agents, the union leadership and/or the teams) being a prerequisite for service.
.
Let us re-examine and re-visit the Tammany Hall-like mentality of Mr. Smith for new readers and the peanut gallery and refresh the memories of the press and media as well as current and retired NFL players:
.
As previously reported: “Mr. Smith has swept under the rug a $28 million dollar judgment against his predecessor’s leadership for breaches of conduct and fiduciary duty, $21 million of which was punitive. Yet, Smith approved the settlement agreement on damages and has rewarded those duty-breachers instead of giving them pink slips.”
.
A huge problem is the virtual sole-proprietorship manner that the NFLPA marketing company is operated. If you will further recall, the former Assistant Executive Director of the NFLPA, Doug Allen (Upshaw’s sidekick), who also assisted in directing the operation of the NFLPA marketing company, had his gross pay increased from $446,281 in 2006 to $1.9 million in 2007. Allen’s wife saw her pay double to $633,534. Allen’s boss Upshaw had his income increased to $6.7 million. Over the years, how much unjustified self-enriched compensation (due to legal manipulation) has been paid to union leadership and their cronies to the detriment of the union membership (especially those with inadequate pensions and/or physical disabilities)?
.
In 1982, that small band of brothers that compelled the ending of the labor strike did so because they had a unified purpose with an impenetrable sense of integrity and resolve. At that time, the union leadership didn’t even have a semblance of a believable strategy or an appearance of being reliable to those they were representing. In fact, they appeared arrogant, unfocused, incompetent and self-serving. Their true place in the end-game negotiations of that year of embattlement became a HUGE inside joke. They became a bigger joke 5 years later during and after the demise of the 1987 strike.
.
As in the Dallas Morning News sports editorial dated July 11, 1982 titled “Garvey Garbling Player Issues” the writer specifically and most accurately fore-warned the following: “The union is supposed to protect the players from management; who will protect the players from the union?”
.
Now the joke is on all of those individuals who allowed those decertified union leaders of the failed 1987 strike to re-establish themselves in the early 90’s. Since that time, they have finagled their way in to a flow of cash and perks that have virtually remained unbalanced and unchecked for nearly twenty years.
.
Presently, a lawsuit is pending in the federal court of Minnesota seeking that unified purpose and a unified goal that existed for that cadre of players in the pivotal altercation of 1982. The same is possible today. However, one must learn from past successes and past blunders.
.
In 1944, Allied Supreme Commander Dwight “Ike” Eisenhower had to forge an alliance among many factions and many different cultures and temperaments to achieve victory against the Nazis. It wasn’t easy! Too many people were concerned more with who got credit if they won than for achieving a joint victory. It took a strong leader to voice a firm unified front with little or no compromise.
.
Today’s interested parties have an opportunity to pull together behind the efforts of their attorneys and fellow brethren to stop the flow of union monies away from their constituents while seeking and achieving adequate pensions and proper health and disability benefits for ALL.
.
Unfortunately, as in 1944, Pre-1993 retired players are immersed in a similar situation. There are too many people concerned on who is going to get us to the goal line rather than getting OVER the goal line. Now is the time to truly unite. Set aside your ego and cease the childish statements of whose lawyers have done this and how many players are backing our group which is more than your group. Enough already!!!
.
As of the date of this editorial, I have not met any of the attorneys who are working on behalf of the retired players. However, I have met John V. Hogan several times. He is a brilliant attorney with a sense of integrity and compassion that has no equal. So I would ask him what he believes should be the most effective avenue of pursuit. At this time, I believe that if Michael Hausfeld has matters in place to achieve an aggressive stance of attack, then it is time for the formation of ONE TEAM. But that attack MUST achieve distancing pre-1993 retired players from any control or influence of the NFLPA. Remember: The verdict from the Adderley Lawsuit clearly established that the NFLPA leadership cannot be trusted.
.
Additionally, I also believe that this matter is a battle that requires a passionate communicator in the Court of Public Opinion and NOT just in the Court of Law. Based on all of the above and more, that is an issue that must be addressed NOW!
.
It is the belief of many that the reason DeMaurice Smith has been dodging questions and laying low, since the apparent resolution of the CBA, is because he knows what he has done, or shall I say, has NOT DONE and he knows that he does not have the guile or knowledge to bear close scrutiny in a public forum. Check him out, he yells when he wishes to show concern for those he has no concern for and leaves, without directly answering a question, when he has no evidence to support his position. At the Santa Clara Law Symposium, when it came to the latter, that is exactly what he did.
.
When questioned by Mike Francesa (of The FAN in NYC), Smith made statements that were clearly misleading and flat out inaccurate. But Mike, at no fault of his own, trusted that Smith wouldn’t possibly state something on the air that was blatantly misleading.
.
Smith knows that he could not get away with that garbage with someone who could regurgitate the facts and law every time he uttered unsubstantiated remarks. If Smith were to appear in a debate on the issues (where he could not walk away without people knowing he was hiding something) with all the misstatements he has made, it would be like shooting fish in a barrel with a twenty-gauge shotgun with unlimited shells.
.
It is time to get behind each other as “ONE TEAM” and leave no soldier (player) behind, no matter what. Show DeMaurice Smith what the term “ONE TEAM” was meant to mean. Only a man who has fought the good fight while standing shoulder-to-shoulder with them could sense that camaraderie.
.
I did.
.
Only a man with a clear conscience would know that feeling. I guess that leaves DeMaurice Smith out.
.
I rest my case.
.
Spencer Kopf
Joe DeLamielleure-HOF
Elvin Bethea-HOF
Leroy Kelly-HOF
Lem Barney-HOF
Reggie McKenzie
Billy Joe DuPree
Fred Dean
Art Still
Isaac Curtis
Jim Breech
Jeff Yeates
Chuck Ramsey
Dermontti Dawson
Dave Pear
John V. Hogan
.
Spencer Kopf has been a licensed attorney in the state of Texas for 34 years and offers expertise in the areas of corporate law, criminal law, sports and entertainment law, civil litigation, and contract negotiations.
.
At the age of 16, Spencer attended the University of Pennsylvania as a superior high school student. He attended Oklahoma City University on an academic and debate scholarship where he earned a B.A. and his Juris Doctorate. In 1982, he was appointed to the bench as a Municipal Court Judge in Collin County, and three years later, elected by his judicial peers to serve as the president of the Texas Municipal Courts Association – the first Municipal Court Judge from North Texas to be so honored. At 35 years old, Spencer was the youngest judge to ever serve in that capacity. He was also unanimously nominated by the Supreme Court of Texas to serve on the Judicial Qualifications Review Commission.
.
He has represented more than 100 professional athletes and at one time, represented one-third of the Dallas Cowboys roster as their attorney. He has also served as a guest legal sports analyst for the Dallas Morning News.
.
.

Duerson Apparently Did Not Review Andrew Stewart NFL Disability Claim

Posted with the express consent of Irv Muchnick:
.
Published September 10th, 2011
.
On August 16, FoxSports.com’s Alex Marvez broke the story of a lawsuit against the National Football League’s Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle Retirement Plan, in federal court in Maryland, by retired player Andrew Stewart. I discussed the case on my Concussion Blog – click HERE.
.
The premise of Marvez’s piece aligned with an important investigative angle of this blog: that the Stewart suit might reveal more about the work on the disability claims review board of Dave Duerson. But it turns out that, while Stewart’s attorneys have made a lot of progress in getting scrutiny in open court of the board’s inner workings – a very good thing – Duerson himself did not participate in the deliberations of Stewart’s particular case in August of last year.
.
The three NFL Players Association representatives on the board for Stewart’s review were Andre Collins, Robert Smith, and Jeff Van Note. “I do not know why Duerson was not on the Board that day,” Stewart attorney Michael Rosenthal e-mailed me.
.
According to John Hogan, who represents many retired players from his disability law practice in Georgia, retirement board members occasionally designate others as proxies, and that is probably what happened here. The whole process is mysterious and secretive, which is why we need the drip-drip-drip of additional cases to break down the NFL and NFLPA’s limestone wall. (The judge in the Stewart case has set a trial date, though he has not yet ruled on whether to permit live testimony. But the court seems to be leaning that way.)
.
As I’ve said many times, perhaps the most tumultuous litigation for the football-concussion system isn’t by professionals. Rather, it involves youth athletes and the financial exposure of public schools for disabling injury and wrongful death. Without tackle football mania at the grassroots, the $10-billion-a-year NFL cannot recruit, inculcate, and thrive. We already know of one lawsuit in New Jersey by the family of a kid who died from a second concussion after being cleared to return to play – with the help of NFL and World Wrestling Entertainment witch doctor Joseph Maroon’s “ImPACT concussion management” software.
.
Irvin Muchnick is author of CHRIS & NANCY: The True Story of the Benoit Murder-Suicide and Pro Wrestling’s Cocktail of Death (2009) and WRESTLING BABYLON: Piledriving Tales of Drugs, Sex, Death, and Scandal (2007). He is a widely published magazine journalist and has appeared on forums as diverse as Fox News’ “O’Reilly Factor,” National Public Radio’s “Fresh Air with Terry Gross,” and ESPN’s “Up Close.” Muchnick is lead respondent in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case for freelance writers’ rights, Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick.
.
BeyondChron contributor Irvin Muchnick has launched his new website and blog “Concussion Inc.”. You can also find Irv on Twitter at http://twitter.com/irvmuch.
.

Guys,
.
A few comments from the notes I took down during the Santa Clara Law Sports Law Symposium:
.
I was able to catch De alone for a few minutes outside at the coffee urn. He acted like he didn’t know who I was. Maybe he doesn’t??? In any event, I told him that I would really appreciate the opportunity to sit down with him and discuss disability. He told me to send him an e-mail!
.
I received compliments from at least two guys who were amazed that I could hold my tongue during my presentation! I did directly ask him one question in my presentation – and he never answered it. It was about the new neuro-cognitive benefit – which I think is more PR or window dressing than a measure which will actually help any retired players.
.
I thought he was taking down a lot of notes during my brief presentation – in fact, one of the audience members said that he was. However, when I looked over at him after I was finished, all I saw on the paper were doodles!
.
De was the keynote speaker before our panel – the topic was concussions. However, other than saying that concussions were the NFL’s most significant health issue in the past five years, he did not speak at all about concussions. Rather, he said, “We need a broader discussion on health issues…(including) diabetes and heart disease… (as well as obesity).”
.
One former player said that his talk was more like a commencement address, as it was filled with generalities and platitudes: “Our proper goal should be what is right and what is fair.” (Duh!) He also said to be, “…radical in your thoughts, unyielding in your criticism, with the goal of seeking justice.”
.
Someone in the audience called out “My cow died!”
.
De continued, unfazed, until the guy yelled out again “My cow died!”
.
Somewhat rattled, De asked “What do you mean?” To which the heckler replied “I don’t need your bull anymore!”
.
Now I can Dig That!
.
Not a word about retired players. Not a word about the Legacy fund. Most unfortuately, there was no time for questions and De made a dash for the door with Delvin Williams and Irv Muchnick trying to ask him questions.
.
Well, at least he showed up…
.
John Hogan
Disability Attorney & Retired Players Advocate
.
.
.

EDITOR’S NOTE: George Visger caught up with me on the phone this morning just before arriving at a job site. George is back at work trying hard to help his family recover from losing their home after suffering another near-fatal brain shunt failure last October. George is one of the most remarkably intelligent and resilient guys I’ve ever met and his tenacity comes through in everything he does. I often talk to him about what might have happened with his life had he never played professional football and sustained his life-altering brain damage. He starts off with an answer to John Hogan’s earlier post (click HERE to read John Hogan’s comment).
.

From TheUnion.com: George Visger, a Grass Valley resident, shows his 1981 San Francisco 49ers team photo and Super Bowl ring. Visger has undergone nine brain surgeries since he stepped off the football field for the final time.

continue reading »

Posted with the express consent of Irv Muchnick:
.

Notes on NFLPA Boss DeMaurice Smith at Santa Clara Sports Law Symposium

continue reading »