<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NFL&#8217;s Dr. No</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/</link>
	<description>• the unofficial blog for independent football veterans •</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Visger</title>
		<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/comment-page-1/#comment-21643</link>
		<dc:creator>George Visger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepear.com/blog/?p=4176#comment-21643</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.davepear.com/images/GeorgeVisger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;George Visger&quot; /&gt;
As I watched the NO Boy with his little sneer spew out his very obviously pre-recorded answers to the questions, I couldn&#039;t help but hope to see a large, hairy forearm fly across the screen and wipe the smirk off his jock-sniffing face! Just like many of the NFL owners, the NO Boy is a self-serving individual, only looking for ways to benefit himself and stuff his pockets at our physical and mental expense. But then again, he&#039;s making decisions which are outside his realm of expertise.  

As a wildlife biologist, I try not to make decisions regarding hydrology, and I would most humbly suggest to NO Boy that he stick with his joints and leave neurological issues to the big boys who actually went to school for such training.

It is an unfortunate reality, but decisions which affect our lives are often made by self-serving individuals such as NO Boy, even though they have &lt;strong&gt;NO FORMAL TRAINING&lt;/strong&gt; in such matters.

Anyone with half a brain, (and considering I just returned from a 3-day evaluation at Dr. Amen&#039;s clinic and I don&#039;t have much more than that it still functions after 9 brain surgeries), can see through the NFL&#039;s weak, last-ditch effort to dodge the issues. Where was the NO Boy and all the other EXPERTS at the Congressional hearing last week? They were all hiding in their holes where they belong!!! None of them had the balls to show at the hearing, and Goodell and Smith acted surprised their experts were supposed to be there! They all should have been held in contempt.

Hang in there, boys - the tide is changing. We have put up with this carnage for much too long and it&#039;s time we aired the NFL&#039;s dirt laundry and took care of one another.  

We need &lt;strong&gt;EVERYONE&lt;/strong&gt; to step forward and be heard.

George Visger
San Francisco 49&#039;ers
1980 &amp; 1981</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.davepear.com/images/GeorgeVisger.jpg" alt="George Visger" /><br />
As I watched the NO Boy with his little sneer spew out his very obviously pre-recorded answers to the questions, I couldn&#8217;t help but hope to see a large, hairy forearm fly across the screen and wipe the smirk off his jock-sniffing face! Just like many of the NFL owners, the NO Boy is a self-serving individual, only looking for ways to benefit himself and stuff his pockets at our physical and mental expense. But then again, he&#8217;s making decisions which are outside his realm of expertise.  </p>
<p>As a wildlife biologist, I try not to make decisions regarding hydrology, and I would most humbly suggest to NO Boy that he stick with his joints and leave neurological issues to the big boys who actually went to school for such training.</p>
<p>It is an unfortunate reality, but decisions which affect our lives are often made by self-serving individuals such as NO Boy, even though they have <strong>NO FORMAL TRAINING</strong> in such matters.</p>
<p>Anyone with half a brain, (and considering I just returned from a 3-day evaluation at Dr. Amen&#8217;s clinic and I don&#8217;t have much more than that it still functions after 9 brain surgeries), can see through the NFL&#8217;s weak, last-ditch effort to dodge the issues. Where was the NO Boy and all the other EXPERTS at the Congressional hearing last week? They were all hiding in their holes where they belong!!! None of them had the balls to show at the hearing, and Goodell and Smith acted surprised their experts were supposed to be there! They all should have been held in contempt.</p>
<p>Hang in there, boys &#8211; the tide is changing. We have put up with this carnage for much too long and it&#8217;s time we aired the NFL&#8217;s dirt laundry and took care of one another.  </p>
<p>We need <strong>EVERYONE</strong> to step forward and be heard.</p>
<p>George Visger<br />
San Francisco 49&#8242;ers<br />
1980 &#038; 1981</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hogan</title>
		<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/comment-page-1/#comment-21641</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepear.com/blog/?p=4176#comment-21641</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.davepear.com/images/John_HoganSM.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;John Hogan&quot; /&gt;
Too bad he didn&#039;t say &quot;&lt;strong&gt;NO&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; when offered to co-chair the NFL TBI committee!

John Hogan
Disability Attorney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.davepear.com/images/John_HoganSM.jpg" alt="John Hogan" /><br />
Too bad he didn&#8217;t say &#8220;<strong>NO</strong>&#8221; when offered to co-chair the NFL TBI committee!</p>
<p>John Hogan<br />
Disability Attorney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/comment-page-1/#comment-21639</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepear.com/blog/?p=4176#comment-21639</guid>
		<description>John -

You do know that Ira Casson already has an answer for your questions, don&#039;t you?

It&#039;s &quot;&lt;strong&gt;No!&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John -</p>
<p>You do know that Ira Casson already has an answer for your questions, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;<strong>No!</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hogan</title>
		<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/comment-page-1/#comment-21637</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepear.com/blog/?p=4176#comment-21637</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.davepear.com/images/JohnHoganSM.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;John Hogan&quot; /&gt;
If there are no connections between football head injuries, depression and dementia, etc., why have the rules been changed to make the game &quot;safer&quot;? Why are they constantly striving to improve helmets? And why are guys fined $25,000 for a helmet-to-helmet hit?

John Hogan
Disability Attorney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.davepear.com/images/JohnHoganSM.jpg" alt="John Hogan" /><br />
If there are no connections between football head injuries, depression and dementia, etc., why have the rules been changed to make the game &#8220;safer&#8221;? Why are they constantly striving to improve helmets? And why are guys fined $25,000 for a helmet-to-helmet hit?</p>
<p>John Hogan<br />
Disability Attorney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pear</title>
		<link>http://davepear.com/blog/2009/10/the-nfls-dr-no/comment-page-1/#comment-21452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepear.com/blog/?p=4176#comment-21452</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.davepear.com/images/DaveHeidiSM.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Dave &amp; Heidi Pear&quot; /&gt;
Thank you, Congresswoman Linda Sanchez!

Conflicts of interest are a way of life for the NFL. 

The 20 new programs that Commissioner Goodell alluded to are gibberish. I know because I have tried to access them and they are &lt;strong&gt;ALL&lt;/strong&gt; virtually worthless. (However, some of them do have fancy names!)

If these new programs or benefits are so darn good, Roger, why don&#039;t you use them for you and your family? You could make your new 20 programs standard protocol for &lt;strong&gt;ALL NFL employees&lt;/strong&gt;. Is this a good idea?

Or do you talk the talk but aren&#039;t able to walk the walk?

&lt;strong&gt;YOUR&lt;/strong&gt; NFL-paid doctors are not qualified brain doctors. Did they study the brain at a legitimate University (in the United States) or are they orthopedic surgeons who have been asked to sit on a board? Would sitting on a board be considered &quot;sedentary&quot; work? Orthopedic doctors aren&#039;t qualified to make employment decisions in Corporate America but that rule doesn&#039;t apply in the NFL. The NFL plays by their own rules. The vocational aspect of disability is &lt;strong&gt;TOTALLY&lt;/strong&gt; missing in the NFL and &#039;handicap&#039; is only applied or discussed on the golf course where those same doctors are buddying up to the coaches and team owners.

It seems that all these NFL-paid orthopedic doctors who examine disabled retired players and deny them their disability benefits always use the word &quot;sedentary&quot; as the type of employment they are able to do.

Retired players who were denied their disability could certainly sit on the board and perform &quot;sedentary&quot; work. They would then be able to provide valuable information about some of the serious injuries retired players and their families must live with.

So why does the NFL turn their back on their injured players?

Please allow me to give you some unsolicited information: Orthopedic surgeons usually work with the big bones in the body such as hips, knees, shoulders, etc. Among their peers in the medical field, they&#039;re known as the carpenters.

However, neurosurgeons usually specialize in the spinal area of the body where there are many nerve endings and smaller body parts They also go to school longer than orthopedic doctors. Neurosurgeons specialize in the more intricate and smaller delicate parts of the body which are in the spinal area and are connected directly to the brain. 

Why would the NFL not want to use a doctor that is &lt;strong&gt;QUALIFIED&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;NEUTRAL&lt;/strong&gt;? 

Just like the tobacco industry did for years, what&#039;s the NFL trying to hide?

Sincerely,
Dave &amp; Heidi Pear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.davepear.com/images/DaveHeidiSM.jpg" alt="Dave &#038; Heidi Pear" /><br />
Thank you, Congresswoman Linda Sanchez!</p>
<p>Conflicts of interest are a way of life for the NFL. </p>
<p>The 20 new programs that Commissioner Goodell alluded to are gibberish. I know because I have tried to access them and they are <strong>ALL</strong> virtually worthless. (However, some of them do have fancy names!)</p>
<p>If these new programs or benefits are so darn good, Roger, why don&#8217;t you use them for you and your family? You could make your new 20 programs standard protocol for <strong>ALL NFL employees</strong>. Is this a good idea?</p>
<p>Or do you talk the talk but aren&#8217;t able to walk the walk?</p>
<p><strong>YOUR</strong> NFL-paid doctors are not qualified brain doctors. Did they study the brain at a legitimate University (in the United States) or are they orthopedic surgeons who have been asked to sit on a board? Would sitting on a board be considered &#8220;sedentary&#8221; work? Orthopedic doctors aren&#8217;t qualified to make employment decisions in Corporate America but that rule doesn&#8217;t apply in the NFL. The NFL plays by their own rules. The vocational aspect of disability is <strong>TOTALLY</strong> missing in the NFL and &#8216;handicap&#8217; is only applied or discussed on the golf course where those same doctors are buddying up to the coaches and team owners.</p>
<p>It seems that all these NFL-paid orthopedic doctors who examine disabled retired players and deny them their disability benefits always use the word &#8220;sedentary&#8221; as the type of employment they are able to do.</p>
<p>Retired players who were denied their disability could certainly sit on the board and perform &#8220;sedentary&#8221; work. They would then be able to provide valuable information about some of the serious injuries retired players and their families must live with.</p>
<p>So why does the NFL turn their back on their injured players?</p>
<p>Please allow me to give you some unsolicited information: Orthopedic surgeons usually work with the big bones in the body such as hips, knees, shoulders, etc. Among their peers in the medical field, they&#8217;re known as the carpenters.</p>
<p>However, neurosurgeons usually specialize in the spinal area of the body where there are many nerve endings and smaller body parts They also go to school longer than orthopedic doctors. Neurosurgeons specialize in the more intricate and smaller delicate parts of the body which are in the spinal area and are connected directly to the brain. </p>
<p>Why would the NFL not want to use a doctor that is <strong>QUALIFIED</strong> and <strong>NEUTRAL</strong>? </p>
<p>Just like the tobacco industry did for years, what&#8217;s the NFL trying to hide?</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Dave &#038; Heidi Pear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
