NFL Claims Workers’ Compensation Should Cover Players’ Head Injuries - FOX: Head-trauma Lawsuits Against NFL Swell - NY Times: Giants Beat Patriots in Final Rally 21 - 17 - NJ.com: Izenberg: At Super Bowl, John Mackey's widow speaks out against a cruel, arbitrary NFL rule - FOX: NFL to air Super Bowl ad on player safety - FOX Sports: 4 NFL concussion lawsuits being combined in Philadelphia - SportingNews: Concussion lawsuits could be tip of crisis for NFL

Congressional Hearings on C-Span

Oct 28, 2009

The day’s session has concluded and is now online in its entirety for viewing. Click on the morning or afternoon clip below to go directly to C-Span site to view.

AAA

CSpan AM Testimony

AAA

CSpan PM Testimony

AAA

Related Posts

2 Responses so far | Have Your Say!

  1. Dave Pear
    October 28th, 2009 at 3:09 PM #

    Dave Pear SuperBowl Ring
    Dear Commissioner Goodell,

    Do you agree with Rep. Maxine Waters?

    “When Goodell said that talks between owners and players are in the early stages, Waters said it’s time “for Congress to take a look at your antitrust exemption” and that she thinks it should be removed.”

    Sincerely,
    Dave & Heidi Pear

  2. John Etter
    October 29th, 2009 at 8:14 AM #

    Dave,

    I agree Congress should be looking at removing the NFL’s anti-trust exemption if immediate and substantive action by the NFL on player head injuries and player disability payments is not forthcoming. The anti-trust exemption affords the NFL obvious advantages other businesses do not enjoy, resulting in greater profitability. As such, the NFL is obliged to treat its labor force (the players, current and retired) as more than an expense figure to be reckoned with on their bottom line.

    John Etter
    UW Huskies
    Go Huskies!